Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Corrigendum
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Corrigendum
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Corrigendum
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/APOS_13_2025

Assessment of skeletal maturity using salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate as a biomarker: A clinical study

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sri Siddhartha Dental College, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India.
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Jaipur Dental College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
Author image
Corresponding author: Swadhinata Handique, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sri Siddhartha Dental College, Tumakuru, Karnataka, India.swadhi469@gmail.com
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Handique S, Manjula KT, Lalremsanga K, Suresh KE. Assessment of skeletal maturity using salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate as a biomarker: A clinical study. APOS Trends Orthod. doi: 10.25259/APOS_13_2025

Abstract

Objectives:

The aim of the study is to evaluate skeletal maturation using salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels and their correlation with existing skeletal maturity indicators represented by 4 cervical vertebrae growth stages.

Material and Methods:

Based on cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI) growth, 48 samples were split into four groups with ages ranging from 9 to 16 years. Using the passive drooling approach, saliva was collected at a consistent 10 am and placed in marked, sterile plastic centrifuging tubes. These tubes were then immediately frozen at −4°C in a home freezer. Before the DHEA level was determined, samples were centrifuged for 5 min at 5000 rpm. 3 mL of the centrifuged supernatant was then transferred to storage containers and kept at −80 C. Before the assessment, all samples were brought to room temperature.

Results:

Analysis of variance test was applied to compare the DHEA-S levels among the CVMI stages. DHEA-S levels in the group were found to be 12.03 ± 0.87 nmol/mL for CVMI 2, 15.12 ± 1.33 nmol/mL for CVMI 3, 18.9 ± 0.81 nmol/mL for CVMI 4, and CVMI5 to be 22.11 ± 3.17 nmol/mL. Mean DHEA-S levels were higher in CVMI stage 5, followed by stage 4, stage 3, and stage 2.

Conclusion:

In the present study, salivary DHEA-S levels and cervical maturational stages demonstrated the potential utility of salivary DHEA-S as a prospective marker of skeletal maturation to pinpoint the pubertal growth spurt.

Keywords

Cervical vertebral maturation index
Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate
Salivary biomarkers
Skeletal maturation

INTRODUCTION

Timing of early orthodontic treatment has been based on stages of skeletal maturation as they relate to peak height velocity or to maximal treatment response.[1] Literature shows that the skeletal effect of the appliances was more pronounced during the peak height velocity periods than during the prepeak period.[2-4] Craniofacial development has been compared mainly with general body height and in relation to skeletal maturation, evaluated with hand-wrist radiographs. Skeletal maturation assessment based on cervical vertebral examination is the most widely used indicator. The cervical vertebral maturation method relies on inter-stage comparisons of the shape and depth of the inferior concavity and the height and shape of the cervical vertebrae bodies in different growth phases. However, the disadvantage of this method is the challenge of visualizing the subtle changes in the vertebrae, due to an improper neck posture while taking the radiograph, or blocking out of the cervical vertebrae structures by the thyroid collar.[5] Therefore, detecting skeletal maturation using biochemical markers has recently become the focus of an increasing number of studies, especially since they overcome the previously mentioned limitations.[6] Biomarkers have been associated with bone metabolism and cartilage development and production of signals that stimulate growth and development of craniofacial structures and mandibular condyles. The 19-carbon steroids dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S) are the most abundant steroid hormones in the body. They are produced and secreted from the adrenal cortex into the circulation. These sex steroids play major roles in stimulating reproductive glands to produce the sex steroid hormones: Testosterone and estrogen. In growing individuals, the progressively increasing level of DHEA-S can lead to an increase in linear growth velocity and advanced bone age.[7] Therefore, the aim of the study is to evaluate skeletal maturation using salivary DHEA-S levels and their correlation with existing skeletal maturity indicators represented by 4 cervical vertebrae growth stages.

Objectives

  • To record the salivary DHEA-S levels of each patient.

  • To evaluate the skeletal maturational stages using the cervical vertebral maturation index (CVMI).

  • To check for correlation between the mean DHEA-S level and CVMI stages.

  • To check for gender variation in DHEA-S level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study was done on 48 participants (26 male and 22 female) under the age group of 9–16 years who visited the department seeking orthodontic treatment. A general and oral examination was done to exclude: Patients with growth abnormalities, subjects with systemic diseases, subjects under medications, presence of micro-injury to the oral mucosa, and subjects with deciduous tooth exfoliation within 2 days. Selected patients were asked to sign a written consent form by their parents upon explanation of the entire procedure. Radiographic examination of each subject included the pre-existing lateral cephalogram which was analyzed using Baccetti and McNamara[8] stagings [Figure 1]. The subjects belonging to each of the 4 stages were segregated and then divided into 4 groups consisting of 12 subjects each. Using a radiographic view and 0.003-inch lacquered polyester matte acetate tracing paper with a 0.3 mm lead pencil, a single examiner evaluated, analyzed, and measured every record to eliminate inter-examiner variability.[9,10] Following that, the patients were told to rinse their mouths well to get rid of any food particles and to just drink water. Following a 60-min duration, the patients were instructed to gather their saliva in their mouths and drool into the sterile plastic tube until it reached the 5-mm threshold. The samples were then collected by the examiner and stored immediately at −4℃ in a domestic freezer. All samples were collected at 10 am–11 am, keeping in mind the diurnal variation of DHEA-S[11] and centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 5 min using the Remi centrifuge precision refrigerated (CPR) plus centrifuge [Figure 2a and b]. 3 mL of supernatant was transferred to storage containers [Figure 2c]. These vials were transferred to the laboratory freezer to be stored at −80℃ within 4 h[12] [Figure 2d]. On the day of assay, the saliva samples as well as the reagents were brought to room temperature and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)-based DHEA-S Estimation Kit (KRISHGEN Biosystems) that has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration was used to estimate the concentration of salivary DHEA-S [Figure 3a]. The competitive binding concept explains the solid phase ELISA, which was used in the test [Figure 3b and c]

Lateral cephalogram showing C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae.
Figure 1: Lateral cephalogram showing C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae.
(a) Centrifuging machine. (b) Centrifuged saliva. (c) Micropipetted supernatant saliva. (d) −80° laboratory freezer.
Figure 2: (a) Centrifuging machine. (b) Centrifuged saliva. (c) Micropipetted supernatant saliva. (d) −80° laboratory freezer.
(a) Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate kit with reagents. (b) Adding reagents. (c) Color-changing indicating presence of antibodies.
Figure 3: (a) Dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate kit with reagents. (b) Adding reagents. (c) Color-changing indicating presence of antibodies.

Statistical analysis: Descriptive statistics of the explanatory and outcome variables were calculated by mean, standard deviation for quantitative variables, frequency, and proportions for qualitative variables. Inferential statistics like Chi-square test was applied for qualitative variables to find the association. Independent sample t-test was applied to compare the DHEA-S levels between the groups (male vs. female). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was applied to compare the mean DHEA-S levels among the groups (based on CVMI stage) with post hoc Bonferroni for intergroup comparison.

Pearson’s correlation was applied to correlate age and DHEA-S levels based on CVMI stage. The level of significance for the study is set at 5%.

RESULTS

The study consists of subjects from age 9–16 years who were classified into 4 groups based on CVMI stagings. Mean age was highest in CVMI stage 5 (14.83 ± 0.577), followed by stage 4 (13.33 ± 0.492), stage 3 (12.25 ± 0.965), and stage 2 (10.83 ± 0.835) [Table 1].

Table 1: Mean age based on CVMI stages.
CVMI stages N Minimum Maximum Mean S.D
Stage 2 12 9 12 10.83 0.835
Stage 3 12 10 14 12.25 0.965
Stage 4 12 13 14 13.33 0.492
Stage 5 12 14 16 14.83 0.577

CVMI: Cervical vertebral maturation index, S.D: Standard deviation

While comparing the DHEA-S levels between the gender within the groups, females showed higher mean DHEA-S levels in stage 2 (12.70 ± 0.70), stage 3 (16.23 ± 0.32), stage 4 (17.60 ± 0.96), and Stage 5 (22.66 ± 3.54). Independent sample t-test showed no statistically significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05), as shown in [Table 2].

Table 2: Comparison of the dheas levels between the gender within the groups using independent sample t test.
CVMI stages Gender N Minimum Maximum Mean S.D Mean difference p-value
Stage 2 Females 3 11.9 13.2 12.70 0.70 0.88 0.132
Males 9 10.8 13.8 11.81 0.84
Stage 3 Females 3 16 16.6 16.23 0.32 1.47 0.098
Males 9 11.6 16.1 14.76 1.35
Stage 4 Females 7 16.2 18.9 17.60 0.96 0.30 0.556
Males 5 16.5 17.9 17.30 0.61
Stage 5 Females 9 19.7 29.4 22.66 3.54 2.15 0.331
Males 3 20.3 20.7 20.50 0.20

CVMI: Cervical vertebral maturation index, DHEA-S: Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, S.D: Standard deviation. Statistically significant difference was set at p<0.05

The DHEA-S level when analyzed in sample size of 12 per group was found to be 12.03 ± 0.87 nmol/mL for CVMI 2, 15.12 ± 1.33 nmol/mL for CVMI 3, 18.9 ± 0.81 nmol/mL for CVMI 4, and CVMI5 to be 22.11 ± 3.17 nmol/mL. Mean DHEA-S levels were highest in CVMI stage 5. ANOVA test was applied which showed statistically significant difference among the groups with respect to DHEA-S levels (p = 0.001) as shown in [Table 3]. On conducting inter-CVMI comparison using post-hoc Bonferroni test, there was statistically significant difference seen between all CVMI stages (p < 0.05) as shown in [Table 4].

Table 3: Comparison of the dhea-s levels among the groups using anova.
CVMI stages N Minimum Maximum Mean S.D p-value
Stage 2 12 10.8 13.8 12.033 0.873 0.001*
Stage 3 12 11.6 16.6 15.125 1.33
Stage 4 12 16.2 18.9 17.475 0.815
Stage 5 12 19.7 29.4 22.117 3.17
Statistically significant difference was set at p<0.05, S.D: Standard deviation, DHEA-S: Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, CVMI: Cervical vertebral maturation index
Table 4: Inter cvmi stage comparison using post-hocbonferroni.
Inter CVMI stages Mean difference Std. Error p-value 95% Confidence interval
Lower bound Upper bound
Stage 2 Vs Stage 3 -3.0917 0.7441 0.001* -5.148 -1.036
Stage 2 Vs Stage 4 -5.4417 0.7441 0.0001* -7.498 -3.386
Stage 2 Vs Stage 5 -10.0833 0.7441 0.0001* -12.139 -8.027
Stage 3 Vs Stage 4 -2.3500 0.7441 0.017* -4.406 -0.294
Stage 3 Vs Stage 5 -6.9917 0.7441 0.0001* -9.048 -4.936
Stage 4 Vs Stage 5 -4.6417 0.7441 0.0001* -6.698 -2.586
Statistically significant difference was set at p<0.05, CVMI: Cervical vertebral maturation index, CVMI: Cervical vertebrae maturity index

Pearson’s correlation test which was applied to correlate age and DHEA-S levels based on CVMI stage showed positive, strong, and significant correlation in stage 2 (r = 0.644; p = 0.024) and stage 3 (r = 0.649; p = 0.022). Positive, very weak correlation was found in stage 4 (r = 0.023; p = 0.944) and stage 5 (r = 0.026; p = 0.935), as shown in [Table 5].

Table 5: Pearson’s correlation between age and dhea-s based on cvmi stages
Correlation coefficient and probability value Age vs DHEA-S
Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 5
r value 0.644 0.649 0.023 0.026
p value 0.024* 0.022* 0.944 0.935
Statistically significant difference was set at p<0.05, S.D: Standard deviation, DHEA-S: Dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, CVMI: Cervical vertebral maturation index

DISCUSSION

Skeletal maturation assessment plays an important role during optimal orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning.[13] According to Baccetti et al., the ideal biologic indicator for an individual’s skeletal maturity should be measured by the following characteristics: it should be efficient in identifying the peak of mandibular growth, simple, and non-requisite of additional radiation exposure.[14] Previous studies done to check the assessment of skeletal maturation using biomarkers, where DHEA and DHEA-S biomarkers have been reported to play a major role in stimulating growth and proliferation of epiphyseal cartilage and initiation of growth hormone by mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathways which are necessary for the expression of osteoblast-specific genes.[15]

The present study evaluated the skeletal maturation using salivary DHEA-S levels and their correlation with existing skeletal maturity indicators represented by 4 cervical vertebrae maturation stages. DHEA-S was chosen in this study as the serum content of DHEA-S is 300–500 times higher than DHEA. While DHEA is more active at the tissue level, DHEA-S is albumin-bound and forms a circulating reservoir, hence the increased concentration.[16] Srinivasan and Premkumar[17] have conducted a study taking advantage of increased serum DHEA-S concentration correlating with the hand-wrist radiograph to confirm its usefulness as a skeletal maturity indicator. Saliva was selected over blood as saliva carries many advantages:[18]

  1. It is easy to collect

  2. Non-invasive

  3. Handling of samples is safer

  4. Convenient to store

  5. Affordable.

Also, using saliva as a biomarker over gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) sampling can reduce the long waiting period during GCF collecting which can be upsetting for both children and adults.

Despite the relatively modest sample size of 48, standardized sample collection, strict inclusion criteria, and uniform analytical procedures were employed to enhance internal validity. Statistically significant correlations observed in the study suggest that the sample size was adequate to address the primary objective.

DHEA-S shows diurnal variation; hence, the collection of samples was standardized within 10 am–11 am, as this time window corresponds to relatively stable salivary hormone levels.[11] To further reduce potential confounding, participants were instructed to refrain from eating, drinking (except water), strenuous physical activity, and stressful activities for at least 1 h before sample collection. However, complete control of all potential confounders such as individual stress levels and dietary habits was not feasible, which is recognized as a limitation of the study. Hucklebridge et al.[11] investigated the secretory pattern of DHEA at 3-h intervals over 12 h following awakening and found salivary DHEA levels remained stable after falling from high levels upon awakening to noticeably lower levels 3 h later. Furthermore, Matchock et al.[19] found a diurnal rhythm in boys and girls during puberty. Although gender differences were reported descriptively, the primary objective of the study was not to evaluate sex-specific effects but to assess the overall association between salivary DHEA-S levels and CVMI stages. The sample size was calculated to address this primary outcome and may therefore be underpowered to detect subtle gender-based differences. Consequently, gender-wise findings were interpreted cautiously and are presented as exploratory observations. This has been acknowledged as a limitation of the study. Among different ways of collecting saliva, the best method is by passive drooling into a tube without any stimulation, as stated by Hofman.[20] Absorbent pads or cotton rolls if used may be subjected to bacterial degradation over time. Furthermore, chemical substances added to the absorbing pads or cotton rolls may interfere with the saliva.

According to Thomadaki et al.,[21] decreasing the incubation temperature slows the rate at which the salivary protein degrades. To stop bacterial development and additional salivary molecule breakdown, specimens were immediately kept at 4°C domestic freezer and then transferred to −80°C laboratory freezer post centrifugation with little to no deterioration. Existing evidence suggests that sample stored at −4°C is stable up to 6 h without undergoing significant metabolic changes.[12] Results of the present study showed a progressive increase in DHEA-S levels as the skeletal maturation progresses, following the normal release pattern displayed by DHEA-S which peaks 20–30 years later. The DHEA-S levels were low during CVMI-1 stage and sharply increased at CVMI Stage 3, followed by a gradual increase as skeletal maturation progressed, almost reaching the highest value in the completion stage at CVMI stage 5 with the mean value of being 17.28 ng/mL for females and 16.09 ng/mL for males which corresponds with the findings of a related study by Sultana et al.,[22] Matchock et al.,[19] Srinivasan and Premkumar.[17] These investigations have demonstrated a considerable rise before puberty, a peak around 25 years, a reduction throughout the reproductive stage, and a rise before menopause, indicating a potential involvement of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis.

Among all the CVMI stages, there was a statistically significant difference in the means of salivary DHEA-S levels, except between CVMI-S 1 and 2 and between CVMI-S 4 and 5. Srinivasan and Premkumar assessed the DHEA-S levels in serum as a skeletal maturation indicator where they found a sharp increase just before puberty, followed by a progressive increase until the early twenties.[17] Venkatagiriappa et al.[23] used the blood spot collection technique to evaluate the level of DHEA-S based on the hand and wrist maturity index and they observed a similar increase pattern, but this increase was statistically insignificant. They explained that the difference in their results could be attributed to the extensive variation of the DHEA-S values found in all their study groups. Anusuya et al.[24] has gone beyond previous reports and showed a different pattern of DHEA-S levels in serum. They found that the highest mean values of DHEA-S were observed in pubertal phases at CVMI-4 and CVMI-3 in males and females with a statistically significant difference among each CVMI stage except between CVMI-5 and 6. The outcome of this study revealed that the maturation of cervical vertebrae elevates with increasing age and could be used for the evaluation of skeletal maturity.

Limitations

We recognize that the limited sample size and cross-sectional design restrict generalizability. The conclusions have therefore been moderated and framed as preliminary observations. Larger multicenter studies are recommended to further validate these findings.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results obtained from the current study:

  • CVMI stage 2 = 9–13.9 nmol/mL

  • CVMI stage 3 = 14–16.4 nmol/mL

  • CVMI stage 4 = 16.5–19.3 nmol/mL

  • CVMI stage 5 = 19.4–29.5 nmol/mL.

In conclusion, the relationship between salivary DHEA-S levels and cervical maturational stages demonstrates the potential utility of salivary DHEA-S as a prospective marker of skeletal maturation to pinpoint the pubertal growth spurt.

Acknowledgement:

I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to all the contributors, Dr. Manjula KT, Dr. Karthika, and for their support and expertise throughout my research journey. I am also grateful to Department of Pedodontics for their contribution to my work.

Ethical approval:

The research/study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Sri Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, number SSMC/Dent/IEC-43/May 2022, dated May 17, 2022.

Declaration of patient consent:

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given consent for clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that the patient’s names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Conflicts of interest:

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation:

The authors confirm that they have used artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript discussion section.

Financial support and sponsorship: Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , . Monitoring growth during orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:165-75.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:273-87.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Dentofacial orthopaedics in relation to chronological age, growth period and skeletal development. An analysis of 72 male patients with Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with the Herbst appliance. Eur J Orthod. 1988;10:169-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Treatment with an orthopedic appliance system in relation to treatment intensity and growth periods. A study of initial effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;91:143-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Correlation between salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels and cervical vertebral maturation in Saudi individuals. Saudi Dent J. 2022;34:355-61.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , , , , . Investigation of salivary biomarkers as indicators of skeletal and dental maturity in children. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2022;25:576-84.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , . Dehydroepiandrosterone research: Past, current, and future. Vitam Horm. 2018;108:1-28.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , . An improved version of the cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:316-23.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , . Cervical vertebrae maturation method: poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:7.e1-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , , , . Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: Poor reproducibility. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140:182-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . The diurnal patterns of the adrenal steroids cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in relation to awakening. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2005;30:51-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , , . Evaluation of saliva stability for NMR metabolomics: Collection and handling protocols. Metabolites. 2020;10:515.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. , , , , , , et al. Correlation between insulin-like growth factor i and skeletal maturity indicators. Glob Pediatr Health. 2021;8:2333794X211011305.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , . The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod. 2005;11:119-29.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , , , . Development of dentofacial characteristics related to incontinentia pigmenti syndrome: A repeated cross-sectional study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021;160:66-76.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Treatment timing for an orthopedic approach to patients with increased vertical dimension. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133:58-64.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Assessment of serum dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate in subjects during the prepubertal, pubertal, and adult stages of skeletal maturation. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:447-51.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , . Non-invasive methods for the assessment of biomarkers and their correlation with radiographic maturity indicators-a scoping review. Prog Orthod. 2021;22:26.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , . Diurnal and seasonal cortisol, testosterone, and DHEA rhythms in boys and girls during puberty. Chronobiol Int. 2007;24:969-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. . Human saliva as a diagnostic specimen. J Nutr. 2001;131:1621S-5S.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , , et al. Whole-saliva proteolysis and its impact on salivary diagnostics. J Dent Res. 2011;90:1325-30.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , , , , , . The relationship between salivary dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) levels and skeletal maturation parameters before and during pubertal growth spurt in children. Iran J Orthod. 2020;15:1-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . The role of blood spot dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in adjunct to hand wrist radiographs as skeletal maturity indicator. Turk J Orthod. 2016;29:69-72.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , , , , . Serum DHEA-S levels could be used as a comparable diagnostic test to assess the pubertal growth spurt in dentofacial orthopedics. Prog Orthod. 2020;21:15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections