Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Clinical Pearl
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/APOS_103_2024

TADs smart easy bending (T.S.E.B.) protocol for impacted canines treatment supported by temporary anchorage devices and aligners

Department of Orthodontics, Private Practice, Rome, Italy.
Department of Orthodontics, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Mario Alessandro Greco, Department of Orthodontics, Private Practice, Rome, Italy. agrecoden@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Greco MA, Rombolà A, Derton N. TADs smart easy bending (T.S.E.B.) protocol for impacted canines treatment supported by temporary anchorage devices and aligners. APOS Trends Orthod. doi: 10.25259/APOS_103_2024

Abstract

The use of TADs for the treatment of impacted canines represents a fundamental advantage whatever kind of appliance is used for the canine recovery in order to create a reliable and stable anchorage unit. When approaching impacted canines with aligners the use of TADs becomes mandatory to avoid increasing patient compliance, to avoid unreliable mechanics and in particular to avoid any side effects on teeth. In this conditions TADs Smart Easy Bending (T.S.E.B.) protocol could represents a reliable approach since the cantilever needed for canine de-impaction is connected on TADs excluding the dental anchorage.

Keywords

TADs
Aligners
Impacted
Canines
Sectional wire

INTRODUCTION

The use of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) for the treatment of impacted canines represents a fundamental advantage to creating a reliable and stable anchorage unit for the de-impaction stage.[1] Nowadays, a fundamental difference in the use of TADs should be made to have the proper orientation and choice between TADs surgically guided and inserted with devices developed by an orthodontic laboratory and TADs placed manually without a specific device built on but with only the purpose of creating an immediate anchorage support.[2] When approaching impacted canines with aligners, the use of TADs becomes mandatory to avoid stressing patient compliance in the use of elastics, to have a more reliable anchorage system, and, in particular, to avoid any side effects on teeth. Following this concept, the orthodontic treatment will be divided into three steps:

  1. Space opening for canines by means of aligners

  2. De-impaction stage on TADs by means of sectional wires connected to miniscrews (Spider Pin 1.3 × 10 mm)

  3. Space keeping with passive aligners

  4. Torque correction and finishing with active additional aligners.

The author’s approach focuses on simple and smart mechanics creating a reliable anchorage system, which, during the years, became a protocol called TADs Smart Easy Bending. In this clinical scenario, the first part of the treatment is based on aligner space opening by means of distalization and anterior proclination when possible [Figures 1-3]. After this, two TADs are inserted buccally between the first molars and second premolars and between the second premolars and first premolars. A 0.017 × 0.025 titanium molybdenum archwire (TMA) wire is then modeled properly to fit the miniscrews surrounding the TADs and create a loop activated with a vertical and buccal force vector in the proximity of the space of the canine position without any side effects on teeth [Figure 4].[3] The cantilever has been connected with the button bonded on the canines by means of a metallic ligature. The cantilever has been re-activated just removing the metallic ligature and activating the extrusion/ buccal vector by using the plier in the loop [Figures 5 and 6].

Initial panoramic X-ray.
Figure 1:
Initial panoramic X-ray.
(a-c) Pre-treatment records.
Figure 2:
(a-c) Pre-treatment records.
(a-c) Aligners space opening.
Figure 3:
(a-c) Aligners space opening.
(a-c) Sectional wire using 0.017 × 0.025 Titanium molybdenum archwire (TMA).
Figure 4:
(a-c) Sectional wire using 0.017 × 0.025 Titanium molybdenum archwire (TMA).
(a-c) Post-treatment records.
Figure 5:
(a-c) Post-treatment records.
Final panoramic X-ray.
Figure 6:
Final panoramic X-ray.

CONCLUSION

The full eruption was achieved in 7 months. For all the forced eruptions stages, the patient was wearing the aligners properly cut to allow the plastic to fit the extremity of the cantilever close to the canine. On the left side, one TAD failed when the left canine erupted; for this reason, to fulfill the full eruption, a different cantilever has been modeled with a hybrid anchorage: The sectional was surrounded by TAD while one extremity was bonded on the second premolar and the other extremity was connected to the canine after a loop activated in extrusion.

Only at this point, the further aligner stage can be planned for finishing. The final position of the maxillary canines on the panoramic X-ray shows a good periodontal condition and proper axial inclination.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of Interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , . Impacted canine management using aligners supported by orthodontic temporary anchorage devices. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;20:131.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , , . Classification of temporary anchorage devices in orthodontics. J Clin Orthod. 2023;57:353-6.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . Orthodontic extrusion for a preprosthetic approach: A bracketless mini-implant-based mechanics. Orthodontics (Chic). 2012;13:210-5.
    [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
4,000

PDF downloads
68
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections