Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Clinical Pearl
13 (
1
); 55-57
doi:
10.25259/APOS_107_2022

Second molar eruption after resistance factor removal

Department of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

*Corresponding author: Paolo Albertini, Department of Orthodontics, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. dr.paoloalbertini@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Albertini P, Pellitteri F, Albertini E, Pavan F, Lombardo L. Second molar eruption after resistance factor removal. APOS Trends Orthod 2023;13:55-7.

Abstract

The eruption of the second molars may delay the therapy and lengthen the treatment time. To minimize excessive treatment prolongation, the principle of resistance factor elimination was applied to the unerupted second lower molar through a surgical incision on the occlusal gingival tissue. The 3.7 was successfully erupted and easily bonded the following month, to allow the archwires sequence.

Keywords

Lower second molar
Eruption
Bonding time
Surgical-assisted eruption

Second molars bonding is mandatory to achieve good occlusion and marginal ridges alignment.[1]

Sometimes, second molars eruption could stop the therapy progress and lengthen the treatment time.[1]

Matthews and Kokich recommended an alternative technique to promote the canines disimpaction, which consists of resistance factors removal to facilitate the teeth eruption.[2,3]

This concept of resistance factors removal was applied to the unerupted second molar to avoid excessive treatment prolongation.

A 14-year-old Caucasian female patient presented skeletal Class I malocclusion, hypodivergent facial pattern, and deep bite. At the beginning of the treatment, the elements 1.7, 2.7, and 4.7 were close to erupt, while tooth 3.7 did not yet exhibit complete root formation. After 17 months of treatment with a labial fixed appliance a successful alignment and leveling of the arches were achieved; however, element 3.7 was still unerupted [Figure 1] even if the eruption path seemed favorable [Figure 2]. Nevertheless, after 4 months of waiting, the lower left molar position remained unchanged [Figure 3].

Occlusal lower arch view showed a 4.7 completely leveled and an unerupted 3.7.
Figure 1:
Occlusal lower arch view showed a 4.7 completely leveled and an unerupted 3.7.
3.7 initial X-ray.
Figure 2:
3.7 initial X-ray.
Four months later 3.7 X-ray.
Figure 3:
Four months later 3.7 X-ray.

After 22 months from the beginning of the treatment, the molar was not erupted yet, leading to the decision to incise gingival tissue on the eruption path. The incision was made under local anesthesia with a surgical scalpel to a depth that eliminated occlusal gingival tissue hindering eruption. [Figure 4]; contrary to other case reports, no flaps, no ostectomies and no dental elevators were required since element 3.7 was not covered by bone and it presented a correct vertical orientation.[4,5]

Gingival tissue incision on 3.7 eruption path.
Figure 4:
Gingival tissue incision on 3.7 eruption path.

Chlorhexidine mouthwash was prescribed for the 3 days after surgery.

The following month the 3.7 was finally erupted and easily bonded with the insertion of a.016” Copper NiTi archwire for initial alignment [Figure 5].

3.7 Eruption and bonding, with the insertion of a 0.016” Copper NiTi archwire.
Figure 5:
3.7 Eruption and bonding, with the insertion of a 0.016” Copper NiTi archwire.

The 0.019 × 0.025 Copper NiTi [Figure 6] and SS [Figure 7] archwires were inserted to complete the sequence and after 8 months from the surgical procedure, the molars marginal ridges were aligned and leveled.

Insertion of a 0.019 × 0.025 Copper NiTi archwire.
Figure 6:
Insertion of a 0.019 × 0.025 Copper NiTi archwire.
Insertion of a 0.019 × 0.025 SS archwire.
Figure 7:
Insertion of a 0.019 × 0.025 SS archwire.

The total treatment time was 34 months; therefore, element 3.7 delayed the end of the case for almost 1 year. Although, the treatment time would have been further prolonged if resistance factors had not been removed to facilitate the eruption of the left lower second molar.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , . A novel method for measuring tooth angulation in permanent mandibular second molars with delayed tooth eruption. J Orthod. 2021;48:260-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Palatally impacted canines: The case for pre-orthodontic uncovering and autonomous eruption. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143:450-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. . Surgical and orthodontic management of impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;126:278-83.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , , . Surgical uprighting of lower second molars. J Clin Orthod. 2016;50:33-40.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , . Surgical uprighting is a successful procedure for management of impacted mandibular second molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:1581-90.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Fulltext Views
12,381

PDF downloads
1,151
View/Download PDF
Download Citations
BibTeX
RIS
Show Sections