Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Letter to Editor
Media and News
Orginal Article
Original Article
Original Research
Research Gallery
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
The Experts Corner
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Original Article
ARTICLE IN PRESS
doi:
10.25259/APOS_137_2024

Investigation of the effects of YouTube videos about orthognathic surgery on people using machine learning-based emotion analysis algorithm

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
Health Administration, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, Turkey.
Author image

*Corresponding author: Ahmet Altan, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey. dt.ahmetaltan@gmail.com

Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, transform, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Altan A, Onat OK. Investigation of the effects of YouTube videos about orthognathic surgery on people using a machine learning-based emotion analysis algorithm. APOS Trends Orthod. doi: 10.25259/APOS_137_2024

Abstract

Objectives:

This study aims to analyze the comments about orthognathic surgery-themed YouTube videos through artificial intelligence and remarking the emotional effects of videos on people.

Material and Methods:

In this study, the keyword “orthognathic surgery” was searched on YouTube. In pursuit of recording sub-video comments, comments were analyzed with a machine learning-based emotion analysis algorithm.

Results:

One thousand one hundred and forty-five comments were analyzed in the study. 2 of 4 surgery videos contain real surgery images. Two videos are animated videos about the details of the surgery. Emotions described in comments are sorted as fear (43.7%), joy (21%), anger (14.6%), and sadness (11.6%). Where comments are reviewed in the aspect of sentiment, negative comments were dense (59.3%), respectively, followed by positive (18.3%), very negative (10.6%), and very positive (2.7 %). Regarding sentiment, differences in comments on real and animation surgery videos are statistically significant (P < 0.05). A significance level of very negative comments was higher in real surgery videos (P = 0.015).

Conclusion:

Different video formats, animation or real videos, may be used for informing, but we think that watching real surgical operation videos may increase people’s preoperative anxiety.

Keywords

Orthognathic surgery
Social media
Artificial intelligence

INTRODUCTION

The Internet has been commonly used in the contemporary modern world due to advancements in information technology. These advancements presented a new communication opportunity known as social media. Social media can be defined as platforms where users convene together and interact socially. The possibility of people commenting on photos, videos, and ideas and providing opportunities for people to exchange their views through comments augments the power of social media. Access of patients to health information and their awareness increased via frequent internet usage.[1] This state has also influenced dentistry; most patients search via the Web about their treatment.[2] YouTube, a social media platform, allows users to upload, watch, and comment on videos. It is possible to reach videos in many different categories on YouTube. Furthermore, there are many informative videos on medicine and dentistry. Research illustrates that 8 of 10 internet users access health information online.[3,4] Despite orthognathic surgical operations, where jaws are being relocated, being relatively safe, any complication may occur as seen in a surgical procedure. Sufficient notification of patients about risks is essential for giving informed and valid consent.[5,6] Most patients strive to fill information gaps via social media platforms like YouTube. Many kinds of videos have been uploaded to YouTube, and users may access those videos immediately. Delli et al.[7] noted that videos about patient experiences might contain misleading information. Hegarty et al.[8] remarked that most YouTube videos providing information about orthognathic surgery have “low” information quality, so they asserted that YouTube is unreliable.

Studies reviewed the content of YouTube videos, but the effects of videos on users were not searched. This study aims to analyze the comments about orthognathic surgery-themed YouTube videos through artificial intelligence and note the emotional effects of videos on people. This study investigated the video about orthognathic surgery and how it affected the watchers.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Study design

In this study, the keyword “orthognathic surgery” was searched on YouTube on January 20, 2022, at 11.38 am. Contents were sorted according to relevancy. The first four videos were included in the study [Table 1]. After the comments under the video were recorded, they were analyzed using a machine learning-based sentiment analysis algorithm. Only English comments were included in the study. Comments written in other languages and those composing only emoji and symbols were excluded. Irrelative answers to comments were also excluded. Ethics committee approval was not necessary because the public data were used.

Table 1: Information about the videos included in the study.
Channel Duration Name of the video
Dentalk! 4.39 min ORTHOGNATHIC surgery - All about JAW realignment surgery © https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g1vQRYrdKEQ
Alila Medical Media 2.15 min Corrective Jaw (Orthognathic) Surgery, Animation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fw2brzBw3Q0
Richardsons Face Hospitals 4.27 min Maxillary Orthognathic Surgery - How the Jaw is broken before advancing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtgE9nzCIVM
Dr. Alexander Antipov 13.11 min Orthognathic Double jaw Surgery (before and after) Behind scenes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VKNI7q0mYOk

Analysis of comments

Emotions underlying video comments were analyzed with the CrystalFeel algorithm, a well-attested sensitivity analytics technology. Usage of this algorithm has increased in recent years.[9-12] CrystalFeel is an emotion analysis algorithm to analyze emotional properties in many output dimensions. Crystalfeel was developed by A*STAR’s Institute of High-Performance Computing (Singapore) researchers who are studying affective and social intelligence. CrystalFeel analyzes emotional properties in text after a text input is given. The software produces two output types according to intensity points: sentiment category and emotion category. Intensities are mentioned as continuous values varying between 0 and 1. The continuous value 0 means that this text states emotion intensity never or at a shallow level, and one means that this text states intensity at very high levels. According to Plutchik’s Emotion Wheel [Figure 1], fear-anger and sadness-joy are the emotional couples of opposite experiences.[13] CrystalFeel algorithm determines five emotions: fear, anger, joy, sadness, and no specific emotion.

Plutchik’s emotion wheel.
Figure 1:
Plutchik’s emotion wheel.

Anger is an unpleasant emotional condition characterized by intense, uncomfortable, and hostile reactions to a provocation, trauma, or threat. It generally has many physical and mental effects. In this software, anger includes a range of emotions, such as annoyance, irritation, aggravation, fury, and rage.

Fear is an unlikeable emotion caused by a perceived threat, misery, or damage. Fear causes escaping from threats and also results in freezing or paralysis in extreme conditions. Software fear intensity is measured using a range of negative emotions, succoncernern, anxiety, worrfearred, dread, horror, and terror.

Sadness is an ungracious emotion characterized by disadvantage, loss, desperation, and disappointment. It generally causes silence, stagnation, isolation from others, and depression under extreme conditions. In this software, sadness intensity is measured by a range of emotions, such as helplessness, disappointment, melancholy, sorrow, and grief.

Joy is a positive emotion caused by kindness or satisfaction. It can mean extreme happiness or enthusiasm of spirit. In English, “Joy” may mean a very special happy feeling. Joy intensity may be measured through pleasure, happiness, ecstasy, excitement, hope, pride, gratitude, and compassion. CrystalFeel also distinguishes the five types of sentiment: very negative, negative, neutral or mixed, positive, and very positive [Table 2]. As a result of the analysis, the software reports the most distinctive sentiment and emotion categories. Researchers may see details and samples of the CrystalFeel algorithm from the website www. socialanalyticsplus.net/crystalfeel/.

Table 2: Examples of comments with their emotion and sentiment.
Emotion Sentiment Comments
Fear Very negative Omg the surgery and the healing process must be painful. I need this surgery but also I’m scared.
Anger Negative Can braces fix overbite? I’m kinda mad that as a kid my dentist never told me to get braces, I would’ve gotten it fixed for free. Now I have to pay multiple thousands (maybe around 5k..). Currently always putting my jaw to the front.
Joy Very Positive I had this surgery 5 weeks ago and then another lower jaw surgery 2 weeks after. My results already are incredible, I finally have the smile and bite I always dreamed of.
Sadness Negative Can I fixed my jaw... My lower jaw is ahead than uper jaw. I feel very upset for this problem. Anyone can help me please where I have to go I mean right place for treatment.. Thanks
No specific emotion Neutral or mixed I am getting the last surgery shown in 1 year.

Reliability

Randomly, 229 comments from the research were selected to evaluate the reliability of the analysis. This number covers 20% of analyzed comments. These comments were analyzed by a native English speaker and an experienced oral and maxillofacial surgeon without knowing the results from the CrystalFeel algorithm. Afterward, results from the CrystalFeel algorithm and the obtained ones were compared. Regarding emotion, there was a good agreement between reviewers and Crystalfeel software (Kappa = 0.652). Similarly, there was a good agreement between reviewers and Crystalfeel software regarding sentiment (kappa = 0.785).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed through IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software V23. A Chi-square test was used to compare the comments for videos containing animation and real surgery videos. Analysis results were presented as frequency (percent) for categorical data. Significance was considered as P < 0.05. Parameter consistency between reviewers and Crystalfeel software was determined through Kappa analysis.

RESULTS

The study analyzed one thousand one hundred and forty-five comments. 2 of 4 surgery videos contain real surgery images. Two videos are animated videos about the details of the surgery. Emotions described in comments are sorted as fear (43.7%), joy (21%), anger (14.6%), and sadness (11.6%). Where comments are reviewed in the aspect of sentiment, negative comments were dense (59.3%), respectively, followed by positive (18.3%), very negative (10.6%), and very positive (2.7%) [Figure 2]. The difference between real and animated surgery videos is statistically insignificant in emotion (P = 0.292) [Table 3]. In the aspect of sentiment, differences in comments on real and animation surgery videos are statistically significant (P < 0.05) [Table 4]. A significance level of very negative comments was higher in real surgery videos (P = 0.015).

Distribution of comments by emotion and sentiment scores.
Figure 2:
Distribution of comments by emotion and sentiment scores.
Table 3: Distribution of comments by emotion scores.
Emotion Real video group Animation video group P-value
n (%) n (%)
No spesific emotion 57 (9.8) 48 (8.5)
Fear 246 (42.3) 254 (45.1)
Anger 96 (16.5) 71 (12.6) 0.292
Joy 121 (20.8) 119 (21.1)
Sadness 62 (10.6) 71 (12.6)
Total 582 (100) 563 (100)
Table 4: Distribution of comments by sentiment scores.
Sentiment Real video group Animation video group P-value
n (%) n (%)
Neutral or mixed 57 (9.8) 48 (8.5)
Very Negative 75 (12.9)a 46 (8.2)b
Negative 329 (56.5) 350 (62.2) 0.015*
Positive 100 (17.9) 109 (19.4)
Very Positive 21 (3.6) 10 (1.8)
Total 582 (100) 563 (100)
Significant at the P<0.05 level. There is statistical significance between the columns with different superscripts

DISCUSSION

With increased internet and social media usage, patients may access information about surgical operations unboundedly by watching videos from various browsers.[14,15] The Internet has become a health information resource with searches about treatments, symptoms, drugs, and treatment costs. People report that such information improves their health, affects treatment decisions, and directs them to share new information with healthcare providers.[16] As search engines and medical websites are popular initial points for health information, 25% of people are directed to social media websites.[1,17] In previous studies, YouTube video content was generally reviewed regarding reliability.[8,18] This study investigated the video about orthognathic surgery and how it affected the watchers. Videos mainly cause fear as an emotion and negative as a sentiment.

Anxious patients are less cooperative during dental procedures, more likely to postpone or cancel their appointments, and are generally dissatisfied with their dental treatment. Orthognathic surgery is a treatment that requires a multidisciplinary approach. Often, patients undergo orthognathic surgery after receiving orthodontic treatment. Previous studies have reported that state anxiety levels are high in patients awaiting orthodontic treatment but return to normal within the 1st year.[19] Yildirim and Karacay[20] reported that patients’ dental anxiety and state anxiety scores are high before orthodontic treatment but decrease after 3 months as patients become familiar with their orthodontist and orthodontic treatments. Anxiety and curiosity may persist in patients who will undergo orthognathic surgery after receiving orthodontic treatment. The videos that the patient watches on social media platforms such as YouTube may affect their emotional state. This situation may negatively affect the orthodontist’s treatment process.

Anxiety is an emotional reaction resulting from the activation of an autonomous neural system with the expectation of a future threat or a stressed condition.[21] Oral surgery is known to cause high anxiety, among other procedures.[22] In maxillofacial surgery, management of perioperative anxiety is still difficult.[23] Studies show that uncertainties about the procedures are one of the most important factors promoting anxiety in patients in oral surgery.[22,24] Some factors such as personal characteristics, previous experiences, real-time conditions, social impact, challenging ability, and unboundedly accessed information from sources like the Internet are reported to relatively affect the anxiety levels of patients.[25-27] Although free access to information about some subjects seems advantageous, the effect of using this tool for surgery is not clear on patients’ anxiety. Conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of different information formats are reported in the literature. Kazancioglu et al.[27] claimed that patients watching similar operations from a website are more anxious depending on their clinical experiences. Torres-Lagares et al.[28] reported that informed consent videos containing surgical procedures should be avoided because of the increasing anxiety of patients. Tanıdır et al.[25] found that dubbed videos, subtitled mute videos, and oral informing videos did not significantly increase the anxiety level of patients. Omezli et al.[29] reported that patients tended to be anxious if they watched videos about surgical procedures before surgery. In this study, negative emotions, especially fear and negative sentiment, were formed in the viewers. CrystalFeel software measures a range of negative emotions linked with fear, like concern, anxiety, worry, fear, dread, horror, and terror. Therefore, we can say that watching orthognathic surgery videos on platforms like YouTube may cause an increase in anxiety in people.

Despite being popular, there are some contradictory proofs of how online searches affect relations between patients and healthcare professionals. Some researchers assert that patients usually share information from online searches with healthcare professionals, and healthcare professionals consider this situation positive. Those patients are more informed and aware and accept online searches as more beneficial than harmful.[30,31] On the contrary, other researchers claim that patients share online information less with healthcare professionals, and most have negative attitudes toward online research.[32,33] These recent studies show that healthcare professionals are usually unaware of online information searches of their patients and perceive web-searching patients as misinformed and anxious; online content is hard to review, and they worry about patients behaving according to web searches.[31-34] In this study, patients are described to learn about surgical complications, personal treatment experiences, and treatment costs from their comments on YouTube videos. It is seen that people can easily access real surgery videos prepared for healthcare professionals.

Patient cooperation depends on many factors, including communicating effectively with the treating clinician.[35] Advanced communication improved patient satisfaction and awareness, and motivated harmony was needed during treatment.[36] Evidence about the effects of social media on patient-doctor relations is limited. More studies are needed on using peer-generated health information or the perception of this type of content. Studies on this subject are limited because of the small sample size, insufficient response rates, and lack of details.[37,38] Studies show that half of healthcare providers think that social media intervenes in relations with patients and that patients may be misinformed and worried about forums for complaining healthcare professionals.[37] In this study, people gather negative sentiments from videos about orthognathic surgery, and this situation causes fear. Real surgery videos cause more negative sentiment than animation surgery videos. As most people watching videos are assumed to have orthognathic surgery needs, this pre-consultation situation may negatively affect patient-doctor relations.

CONCLUSION

YouTube contains many videos about orthognathic surgery. When we look at the comments on these videos, which people can easily access, we see that they cause negative emotions and sentiments. Real surgery videos have more negative effects. Different video formats, animation or real videos, may be used for informing, but we think that watching real surgical operation videos may increase people’s preoperative anxiety.

Authors’ contributions

AA: Concept, design, literature review, writing, materials, supervision, data collection and processing, analysis and interpretation; OKO: Critical review, supervision, materials, analysis and interpretation.

Ethical approval

Institutional Review Board approval is not required as public data was used.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent was not required as there are no patients in this study.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for manuscript preparation

The authors confirm that there was no use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted technology for assisting in the writing or editing of the manuscript and no images were manipulated using AI.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

References

  1. , , , , , , et al. Perceived healthcare provider reactions to patient and caregiver use of online health communities. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;96:320-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. , . Dental patients' use of the Internet. Br Dent J. 2009;207:583-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. , , . Using the internet for health-related activities: Findings from a national probability sample. J Med Internet Res. 2009;11:e4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . The health information national trends survey: research from the baseline. J Health Commun. 2006;11(Suppl 1):7-16.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. , . Consent for orthognathic surgery: A UK perspective. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;50:e17-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. , , . Orthognathic surgery: Patient expectations; psychological profile and satisfaction with outcome. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995;33:9-14.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. , , , . Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjogren's syndrome? Oral Dis. 2016;22:196-201.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. , , , , , . YouTubeTM as an information resource for orthognathic surgery. J Orthod. 2017;44:90-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. , , , , , , et al. Global sentiments surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic on twitter: Analysis of twitter trends. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6:e19447.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. , . Analysis of tweets on toothache during the COVID-19 pandemic using the CrystalFeel algorithm: A cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21:418.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , . Contemporary English pain descriptors as detected on social media using artificial intelligence and emotion analytics algorithms: Cross-sectional study. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5:e31366.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. . Emotional effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on oral surgery procedures: A social media analysis. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2021;21:237-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. . A general psychoevolutionary theory of emotion In: , , eds. Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: 1 Theories of emotion. New York: Academic Press; . p. :3-33.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. , , , . YouTube videos to create a “Virtual Hospital Experience” for hip and knee replacement patients to decrease preoperative anxiety: A randomized trial. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5:e10.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Harnessing social media for health promotion and behavior change. Health Promot Pract. 2013;14:15-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , , . Preliminary benefits of information therapy. J Prim Care Community Health. 2011;2:45-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Health-related message boards/chat rooms on the Web: Discussion content and implications for pharmaceutical sponsorships. J Health Commun. 2005;10:209-23.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Are YouTube videos a reliable source of information about genioplasty? J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122:39-42.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. , , , , . Does orthodontic treatment affect patients' and parents' anxiety levels? Eur J Orthod. 2005;27:155-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. , . Evaluation of anxiety level changes during the first three months of orthodontic treatment. Korean J Orthod. 2012;42:201-6.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. . A history of anxiety: From Hippocrates to DSM. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2015;17:319-25.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Factors related to patients' anxiety before and after oral surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66:870-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. , , , , . Non-pharmacological interventions for reducing mental distress in patients undergoing dental procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2018;69:22-31.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . An evaluation of patients' knowledge about perioperative information for third molar removal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70:12-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Information given by multimedia: Influence on anxiety about extraction of impacted wisdom teeth. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;54:652-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , , . The potential of heart rate variability for exploring dental anxiety in mandibular third molar surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;47:809-15.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , , . Does watching a video on third molar surgery increase patients' anxiety level? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119:272-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , , , et al. The effects of informed consent format on preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing inferior third molar surgery. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2014;19:e270-3.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , , . Does watching videos increase the perioperative anxiety in patients undergoing third molar surgery? A randomized trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;78:216.e1-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. , . Survey of doctors' experience of patients using the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:e5.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , . Experiences and attitudes of Dutch rheumatologists and oncologists with regard to their patients' health-related Internet use. Clin Rheumatol. 2010;29:1229-36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Physicians' motives for professional internet use and differences in attitudes toward the internet-informed patient, physician-patient communication, and prescribing behavior. Med 2 0. 2012;1:e2.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . The role of the Internet in patient-practitioner relationships: Findings from a qualitative research study. J Med Internet Res. 2004;6:e36.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. , . The role of provider-patient communication and trust in online sources in Internet use for health-related activities. J Health Commun. 2010;15(Suppl 3):186-99.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. , , . Perceived orthodontist behaviors that predict patient satisfaction, orthodontist-patient relationship, and patient adherence in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:370-7.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , . Orthodontists' assessment and management of patient compliance. Angle Orthod. 1998;68:115-22.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , , . The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: Results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:1168-74.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , , . The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: Results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:403.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections