View/Download PDF
Original Article
3 (
3
); 72-77
doi:
10.4103/2321-1407.115979
CROSSMARK LOGO Buy Reprints
PDF

Microbial colonization around orthodontic ligature ties: An in-vivo study

Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
Raja Rajeshwari Dental College, Bangalore, India
Microbiology, Era Medical College, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
Address for correspondence: Dr. Ashish Kumar Singh, 546, Aakansha Udyan II, Eldeco, Raebareilly Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India. E-mail: drash_singh@rediffmail.com
Disclaimer:
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.
How to cite this article: Bhagchandani J, Singh AK, Mehrotra P, Shashi Kumar HC, Varshney SR, Varshney KR. Microbial colonization around orthodontic ligature ties: An in-vivo study. APOS Trends Orthod 2013;3:72-7.

Abstract

Introduction

Fixed or removable orthodontic appliances impede oral hygiene and result in plaque accumulation. Studies have evaluated the effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on microbial flora and periodontal status, but only a few have evaluated the method of ligation as an additional factor.

Aims and Objectives

To determine the amount of microbial colonization with different elastomeric ligation techniques.

Material and Methods

Twenty subjects and a total of five ligature systems divided into five groups were chosen for the split mouth study. Group II and III (super slick ties and slide ligatures) were ligated over the premolars on the right side while Group IV and V (quick stick ties — angulated and easy to fit ties) were ligated over the premolars on the left side in both the arches. Group I (control) or stainless steel ties were made over the cuspids in the same manner. Elastomeric ligatures were removed after a period of 21 days and sent for culture. The amount of microbial colonies was then compared using stereomicroscope.

Results

The amount of microbial colonization observed was statistically significant (P < 0.001) in all the groups. Group III showed the highest microbial colonization while Group II showed the least.

Conclusion

Super slick elastomeric ligatures were found to have minimal microbial adhesion similar to that of stainless steel.

Keywords

Elastomeric ligature
plaque
decalcification

INTRODUCTION

The development of dental plaque has been associated with several environmental and individual factors including diet composition,[1,2] oral hygiene,[1] fluoride exposure,[3] quality of saliva, composition of the oral microflora, and immune factors.[4,5] Fixed or removable orthodontic appliances also impede the maintenance of oral hygiene, resulting in plaque accumulation.[5,6] Plaque retention surrounding orthodontic appliances leads to enamel demineralization caused by organic acids produced by bacteria in the dental plaque.[7,8]

Recently, fluoride-releasing elastomeric modules[9-11] and chlorhexidine varnish[12] were suggested for reducing plaque accumulation and decalcification.

Fixed orthodontic appliances create new retention areas, which are suitable for bacterial colonization and lead to an increase in the absolute number and percentage of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli.[4,13-24] A lot of studies have evaluated the effect of fixed orthodontic appliances on microbial flora and periodontal status,[13-15,17,20,22,24-27] but only a few studies evaluated the methods of commercially available elastomeric ligations as an additional factor.[4,28]

Therefore, the study was conducted to determine the amount of microbial colonization on different elastomeric ligation ties available commercially and assess as to which elastomeric ligature attracts the least microbial flora and fulfills the criteria for hygienic ligatures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty subjects were selected. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Inclusion criteria for patient selection included age group from 18 to 25 years; complement of permanent dentition, free of dental plaque, motivated for good oral hygiene and undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment with standardized MBT 0.022 slot (Gemini series, 3M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA). Subjects with presence of (a) decalcification or increased risk to caries (high caries index), (b) use of antibiotics during the three-month period, and (c) halitosis and poor periodontal status were excluded from the study. Subjects were instructed to brush once in the morning before breakfast and once in the evening before bed time. They were instructed to brush a minimum of 3 min to ensure thorough brushing and rinse with water after every meal. The investigation was designed as a split-mouth study.

A total of five ligature systems divided into five individual groups were chosen for the study [Table 1, Figures 1-4]. Groups II and III were ligated over the premolars on the right side of the patient both in the upper and lower arch while Groups IV and V were ligated over the premolars on the left side of the patient both in the upper and lower arch. Group I (control) or stainless steel ties were made over the cuspids on either side [Figures 5 and 6].

Table 1: Commercially available orthodontic ligature ties
Group I (Control Group) Stainless steel
Group II Super Slick (TP Orthodontics Inc. La Porte, Indiana, USA)
Group III Slide ligatures (Leone S.p.A. Via P. a Quaracchi, Sesto Fiorentino, Firenze, Italy)
Group IV Quick Stick Tie- Angulated Ties (3 M Unitek)
Group V Easy to Fit Tie (3 M Unitek, Monrovia, California, USA)
Figure 1: Super slick ligature ties
Figure 2: Slide low friction ligature ties
Figure 3: Quick stick tie — angulated ligature ties
Figure 4: Easy-to-fit tie ligature ties
Figure 5: Ligatures tied on right buccal segment using split mouth technique
Figure 6: Ligatures tied on left buccal segment using split mouth technique

Elastomeric ligatures were removed from the patient’s mouth under aseptic conditions on the 21st day and collected in labeled sterile vials with normal saline and sent for microbiological assessment to quantify the amount of microbial colonization on different elastomeric ligature groups as obtained from the patient’s mouth [Figure 7].

Figure 7: Samples collected in labeled vials with normal saline

Stuart transport medium was used and the samples were sent without delay. Serial 10-fold dilutions of the transport medium with the sample of plaque were prepared to 10−4, and 0.1-ml samples were inoculated on sheep blood agar [Figures 8 and 9], Chocolate agar and Robertson cooked meat broth for number of total bacteria and Mitis — Salivarius agar (Difco Laboratories Inc., Detroit, MI, USA) containing 0.001% Chapman Tellurite solution (Difco), 150 g sucrose, and 3.33 mg bacitracin (Sigma Diagnostics, St. Louis, MO, USA) per liter agar for number of S. mutans. The samples were even inoculated on MacConkey agar (HiMEDIA) for secondary bacterial infections. The agar plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C in anaerobic jars. Subsequently, colonies were counted under a stereomicroscope. Also, serial 10-fold dilutions were prepared to 10−3, and 0.1-ml samples were inoculated on two Rogosas agar plates for number of lactobacilli. Both plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, one plate in aerobic conditions and the other in an anaerobic jar. The number of colonies were then determined under a stereomicroscope. Results are expressed as colony-forming units per milliliter. Groups of different ligature ties were then compared by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance of mean difference between the groups was done by Tukey’s post hoc test. A two-sided (α = 2) P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed on STATISTICA Version 6 for Windows (Statsoft, Inc, Tulsa, Okhlahoma, USA).

Figure 8: S. aureus on sheep blood agar
Figure 9: S. mutans on sheep on blood agar

RESULTS

Statistically significant microbial colonization was observed in all the groups (P-value < 0.001). It was highest for Group III (6.50 + 0.53) whereas Group II showed the least amount of microbial colonization(4.20 + 0.42), which was comparable to Group I (4.20 + 0.42). Group IV (4.90 + 0.74) and Group V (4.60 + 0.70) showed slightly higher microbial colonization as compared to Groups I and II but lesser than Group III [Table 2, Figure 10].

Figure 10: Amount of microbial colonization in the groups (cfu/ml)
Table 2: Amount of microbial colonization (Mean±SD, n=20) of five groups
Group I Group II Group III Group IV Group V F value (4,45 DF) P value
4.20±0.42 (4-5) 4.20±0.42 (4-5) 6.50±0.53 (6-7) 4.90±0.74 (4-6) 4.60±0.70 (4-6) 27.21 P<0.001

Numbers in parenthesis indicates the range

Intergroup comparison showed statistically significant microbial colonization in Group III elastomeric ligature ties when compared to Groups I, II, IV, and V [Table 3].

Table 3: Significance (P value) of mean difference of amount of microbial colonization between the groups by Tukey’s test
Comparisons Mean difference q value P value
Group I vs. Group II 0.00 0.00 >0.05
Group I vs. Group III 2.30 12.60 <0.001
Group I vs. Group IV 0.70 3.83 >0.05
Group I vs. Group V 0.40 2.19 >0.05
Group II vs. Group III 2.30 12.60 <0.001
Group II vs. Group IV 0.70 3.83 >0.05
Group II vs. Group V 0.40 2.19 >0.05
Group III vs. Group IV 1.60 8.76 <0.001
Group III vs. Group V 1.90 10.41 <0.001
Group IV vs. Group V 0.30 1.64 >0.05

DISCUSSION

Primary dental care begins at home. Practicing satisfactory oral hygiene, such as adequate tooth brushing, mouth rinsing, and dental flossing, plays a vital role in maintaining healthy teeth, especially in the orthodontic patients.[8] It is a well-known fact that the placement of fixed orthodontic appliances generally hinders good oral hygiene, and the appliance component can cause alteration in oral micro flora by reducing pH, increasing affinity of bacteria to the metallic surface because of electrostatic reactions, and causing retention areas for microorganisms. Thus, they lead to plaque accumulation around the bracket base.

The literature clearly demonstrates that fixed orthodontic appliances increase plaque accumulation, bacterial colonization, and resultant enamel decalcification.[13-15,17,20,22,24,26] However, the contribution of ligation materials to this increase has only been evaluated in a few studies.[4,28] Forsberg et al.[4] evaluated microbial colonization of 12 patients treated by fixed orthodontic appliances and reported that the lateral incisor attached to the archwire with an elastomeric ring exhibited a greater number of microorganisms in the plaque than teeth ligated with steel wire. They also reported a significant increase in the number of S. mutans and lactobacilli in the saliva after the insertion of fixed appliances. They recommended that the use of elastomeric ligation rings should be avoided in patients with inadequate oral hygiene because elastomeric ligation rings will significantly increase microbial accumulation on tooth surfaces adjacent to the brackets, leading to a predisposition for the development of dental caries and gingivitis.

On the other hand, Sukontapatipark et al.[28] and Turkkahraman[34] evaluated the microbial colonization of 20 patients. Upper second premolar was selected as the donor site; the sample was collected at three different time intervals. They found no significant difference between both materials regarding microbial contamination.

In this study, maxillary second premolars were selected as the donor site for microbial samples because the posterior teeth are more prone to plaque accumulation also access to cleaning is less in posterior region. Bacterial sampling was performed at day 1 when thorough oral prophylaxis was done and then at day 21, which is equivalent to the average duration between orthodontic appointments. The study was terminated on the third week because longer periods of observation may affect the results as cooperation, motivation for oral hygiene and dietary habits can change.

This study showed highest microbial colonization with Group III or slide low friction elastomeric ligatures when ligated over the area of premolars. These ligatures produce minimal friction owing to a reduced treatment time; therefore strict hygiene instructions with change of ligatures every appointment would solve any gingival inflammations caused by microbial adhesion over these elastic ligature ties. Slide low friction ligature ties are made of polyurethane mix and have a tubular structure that passively secures the archwire beneath to allow it to slide freely. Therefore, because of its design it tends to attract higher colonies of oral microflora.

Group II or super slick ties (SSt) become extremely slippery when wet or moistened in the oral environment. The highly lubricious surface has proven to reduce friction more than 70% during orthodontic treatment. Bacterial adhesion over these ligature ties were seen to be the least and similar to the control group or the stainless steel ligature ties. The polymeric coating that is used on super slick ligatures demonstrates a resistance to bacteria. Previous studies reveal that SSt that the lubricious coating over these elastomeric ligature ties resists bacterial adhesion levels by 90% in six strains of bacteria tested.[36] Our study was in contrast to the conclusion made by Forsberg et al. who stated that elastomeric ligation should be avoided in patients with poor oral hygiene and that stainless steel ligation should be attempted. Group II or super slick elastomeric ligatures were found to have a similar microbial colonization as that of stainless steel in our study.

Though Groups IV and V, that is, quick stick ties — Angulated (3 M Unitek) and easy-to-fit ties (3 M Unitek), respectively, found a higher microbial colonization than Super slick elastomeric ties but the microbial colonization was significantly lesser than slide low friction elastomeric ligatures.

Results obtained from the present in-vivo study performed on the 21st day cannot be extrapolated to the findings that would be observed with long time intervals. Advancements in the manufacturing of currently available elastomeric ligatures have not only reduced the amount of friction but even reduced the amount of microbial adherence over these attachments similar to that of stainless steel ties.

CONCLUSION

  • Super slick elastomeric ligature ties showed the least amount of microbial flora adherence which was comparable to control group or the stainless steel ligatures.

  • Slide low friction ligatures showed the maximum adherence to microbial flora owing to its complex tubular design.

  • Quick stick ties — angulated ligatures and easy-to-fit ligatures showed a slight increase of microbial flora adherence though it was found to be statistically insignificant.

Source of Support:

Nil.

Conflict of Interest:

None declared.

References

  1. , , , , . Relationships between dietary behaviors, oral hygiene and mutans streptococci in dental plaque of a group of infants in southern England. Arch Oral Biol. 2002;47:491-8
    [Google Scholar]
  2. , , , . Relationship among dental plaque composition, daily sugar exposure and caries in the primary dentition. Caries Res. 2002;36:347-52
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , . The effect of a mouthrinse containing chlorhexidine and fluoride on plaque and gingival bleeding. J Clin Periodontol. 1993;20:49-53
    [Google Scholar]
  4. , , , . Ligature wires and elastomeric rings: Two methods of ligation, and their association with microbial colonization of Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:416-20
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , , et al. Senesi. Effect of removable orthodontic appliances on oral colonization by mutans streptococci in children. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001;109:388-92
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Influences of orthodontic appliances on oral populations of mutans streptococci. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2002;17:65-71
    [Google Scholar]
  7. , . The nature of early caries lesions in enamel. J Dent Res. 1986;65:2-11
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Demineralization and remineralization around orthodontic appliances: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:33-40
    [Google Scholar]
  9. . In vitro and in vivo fluoride release from orthodontic elastomeric ligature ties. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;115:288-92
    [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Fluoride-releasing elastomerics — a prospective controlled clinical trial. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:401-7
    [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Fluoride-releasing elastomeric modules reduce decalcification: A randomized controlled trial . J Orthod. 2001;28:217-9
    [Google Scholar]
  12. , , , , . Effect of sustained-release chlorhexidine varnish on Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces viscosus in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;123:345-8
    [Google Scholar]
  13. , . Effect of orthodontic banding on localized oral lactobacilli. J Dent Res. 1968;47:275-9
    [Google Scholar]
  14. , . Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1970;49:320-4
    [Google Scholar]
  15. , , , . Comparison of Streptococcus mutans concentrations in non-banded and banded orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1981;60:1936-42
    [Google Scholar]
  16. , , , . Enhancement of Streptococcus mutans colonization by direct bonded orthodontic appliances. J Dent Res. 1983;62:1209-11
    [Google Scholar]
  17. , , . Effect of orthodontic treatment on prevalence of Streptococcus mutans in plaque and saliva. Scand J Dent Res. 1984;92:211-7
    [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances. J Clin Periodontol. 1987;14:326-33
    [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Caries incidence in orthodontic patients with high levels of Streptococcus mutans. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:117-21
    [Google Scholar]
  20. , , , . Changes in gingiva and gingival flora with bonding and banding. Angle Orthod. 1987;57:271-8
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , . Streptococcus mutans, lactobacilli and Streptococcus sanguis in plaque from abutment teeth of cemented and of loose retainers. Caries Res. 1987;21:474-80
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients before, during, and after orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:35-7
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , , . The effect of chlorhexidine varnish treatment on salivary mutans streptococcal levels in child orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1992;71:32-5
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , , . The effect of orthodontic treatment on salivary flow, pH, buffer capacity and levels of mutans streptococci and lactobacilli. Aust Orthod J. 1999;15:229-34
    [Google Scholar]
  25. . Aspects of oral health in orthodontic patients. Br J Orthod. 1986;13:95-103
    [Google Scholar]
  26. , , . Effects of orthodontic bands on microbiologic and clinical parameters. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;97:213-8
    [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Longitudinal changes in gingival condition in crowded and noncrowded dentitions subjected to fixed orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124:679-82
    [Google Scholar]
  28. , , , , . Bacterial colonization associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. A scanning electron microscopy study. Eur J Orthod. 2001;23:475-84
    [Google Scholar]
  29. . The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38:610-6
    [Google Scholar]
  30. , , . Long term clinical evaluation of toothpaste and oral rinse containing sanguinaria extract in controlling plaque, gingival inflammation and sulcus bleeding during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:199-207
    [Google Scholar]
  31. . The role of bleeding upon probing in the diagnosis of periodontal disease. A literature review. J Periodontol. 1984;55:684-8
    [Google Scholar]
  32. , . Effect of oral hygiene education on children with and without subsequent orthodontic treatment. Scand J Dent Res. 1980;88:53-9
    [Google Scholar]
  33. , , . Oral hygiene program for orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:208-13
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , , . Archwire ligation technique, microbial colonization and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:231-6
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , . Experimental salivary pellicle on the surface of orthodontic materials. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;119:59-66
    [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , . In-Vitro assessment of bacterial adhesion to Hydromer® coated cerebrospiral fluid shunts. Biomaterials. 1998;14:184-18
    [Google Scholar]
Show Sections