Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Filter by Categories
Book Review
Case Report
Case Series
Clinical Article
Clinical Innovation
Clinical Pearl
Clinical Pearls
Clinical Showcase
Clinical Technique
Critical Review
Editorial
Expert Corner
Experts Corner
Featured Case Report
Guest Editorial
Original Article
Original Research
Review Article
Special Article
Special Feature
Systematic Review
The Experts Corner
View/Download PDF

Translate this page into:

Review Article
11 (
1
); 74-80
doi:
10.25259/APOS_148_2020

The role of AI and machine learning in contemporary orthodontics

Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Corresponding author: Jean-Marc Retrouvey, Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, United States. jean-marc.retrouvey@umkc.edu
Licence
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

How to cite this article: Retrouvey JM. The role of AI and machine learning in contemporary orthodontics. APOS Trends Orthod 2021;11(1):74-80.

Abstract

In the past 20 years, the orthodontic profession has adopted digital technologies such as computer-assisted tooth movement, automated staged dental aligner production, and 3D simulations. Until recently, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) was limited to narrow intelligence and supervised “learning” such as automated cephalometric point recognition, segmentation of teeth from 3D files, and staging of orthodontic treatment. The next step will be to create neural networks based on general intelligence (the human intelligence is considered general intelligence), where the network using powerful computers and complex algorithms will “learn” orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning to suggest the most appropriate treatment plan for optimized treatments and more predictable outcomes. The objectives of this paper are to describe the state of the art in AI and orthodontics and explore potential avenues for future developments and applications.

Keywords

Artificial intelligence
Machine learning
Orthodontics
Diagnosis
Treatment planning

INTRODUCTION

Since Invisalign™ entered the market in 1998 with its cloud based software called Clincheck,[1] the world of orthodontics has evolved dramatically. Align developed a novel concept where the orthodontists submit their patient’s records or dataset in return for a suggested treatment plan and subsequently the production of a set of aligners that move the teeth in predetermined position.[2]

The public embraced the concept, and soon, most of the orthodontic profession joined the growing number of providers submitting their cases to the company in return for a set of aligners. The process was pushed one step further with the submission of sequential records used for “refinement” and final records used for retention.[3]

This process is a unilateral data sharing[4] “association.” All patient data gathered by the orthodontists and dental professionals alike are submitted without any covenant of usage to the align company allowed this company to build an extraordinary and unique dataset of orthodontic treatment outcomes never before gathered by any orthodontic organization.[5]

Orthodontics is an art and a science based primarily on the experience and bias of the clinician.[6,7] Each malocclusion is unique, and it is not possible to totally and predictably correlate the different patterns expressed by the stomatognathic system.[8] Orthodontists usually do not share information among themselves except for the before and after records of patients at conferences with a strong bias toward publishing mainly positive outcomes.

Very little analytic randomized data are obtained from which even less is shared among practitioners. Clinical orthodontists treat one patient at a time and are not equipped to gather or share large dataset of treatments outcome to draw inferences from multiple and asynchronous clinical observations.[9] Orthodontists oftentimes rely on a limited amount of approaches that give them the perceived maximum efficiency. This approach based on clinical experience may frequently result in delayed treatment completion time and potentially less than optimal outcomes.[10]

Artificial intelligence (AI)[11] offers “a way to get sharper prediction from data”[12,13] by simultaneously analyzing all the different variables present in a malocclusion. This capacity offers the potential to assist the practitioner to obtain the most favorable outcome when treating a malocclusion.[14]

CONVENTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE

Studying and diagnosing a malocclusion present many challenges and bring uncertainty to the outcome of treatment due to the large number of variables present in the analysis.[9] The orthodontist must compute mentally all the parameters to recognize patterns based on experience and adopt the most logical or probable approach to solve the problem presented.[15,16] To simplify the analytic process, many orthodontists tend to simplify the analytic process tend to adopt a mechanistical scheme over an in-depth diagnostic approach as it is perceived that experience alone will be enough to assess the probability of success.[9]

This process, called the “feedforward approach,”[17] does not necessarily involve complex feedback mechanisms to improve on previous diagnostics and outcome analyses.[13] [Figure 1] explains this principle as an accepted but potentially inefficient pattern to treat patients. This experience-based approach has been advocated by many clinicians as it is simple but lacks the means to re-evaluate and learn from positive and/or negative outcomes.[18]

Figure 1:: Forward diagnostic process using the “feed forward” approach without feedback.

The “Premeditatio Malorum” looks at a situation and explores all the options where the situation may go wrong to avoid such negative condition. Wouldn’t this approach be a welcomed addition to the feed-forward diagnosis process?[19] Finding potential negative outcomes and then going backward to avoid creating errors in the diagnosis procedure would add more insight than a linear and unidirectional diagnosis process.[20]

BIG DATA, AI, AND MACHINE LEARNING

Machine learning algorithms have existed for a very long time.[21] This field of computer science was initially derived from the field of statistics and then branched out into its own discipline.[22] The latest evolution in this field of research came with advancements in computing power with the introduction of hypercomputers and the use of graphic processing units instead of central processing units. These advances allowed for the acquisition of large amounts of data, known as “Big Data.” Big data came to life in the early 2000 following the publication of a paper by Laney describing the 3Vs (volume, velocity, and variety). *Laney Datafication or the constant collection of data is creating an increasingly large amount of data that drives innovation.[23,24] In recent years, the greatest advancement in the field of machine learning was the introduction of deep learning.[25] AI and deep learning are the new buzzwords in dentistry and they rely on big data.[26]

Computer hardware has evolved dramatically, and now, large amount of data can be acquired and stored very efficiently. Rapid improvements in computing power allowed to train more sophisticated models to accomplish even more or evermore complex tasks, that is, convolutional neural networks for image detection.[27] Data are the key ingredient of machine learning[28] as Modern software programs, sophisticated statistical analyzes, and algorithms require a tremendous amount of data to be able to predict treatment outcomes and analyze the shortcoming of past-approaches. Neural networks use multiple algorithms to attempt to mimic the human brain and based on Bayesian probabilistic graphical models.[29] They require “large datasets to answer queries (questions) regarding a set of standard variables.”[30]

What is a neural network and how does it eventually apply to orthodontic diagnosis?

Neural networks consist of nodes loosely referred as neurons.[31] Each node corresponds to a random variable. There are as many nodes as there are columns into a conventional data table. These nodes require inputs such as amount of overbite, overjet, and crowding which are initially randomly weighted (0 to 1%) and linked to nodes which calculate the correlation in the input layer. To further refine, the calculations and the aptitude of the network to “learn” from the data provided, “hidden layers” are added and create deep learning neural networks to strengthen the probabilities that the neural network predictions will be accurate. Basically, the neural networks learn to recognize patterns and assess the correct probability of success.

The simplest neural network consists of two layers created by a vertical arrangement of nodes and connectors forming one input and one output.[32] The nodes can perform simple data processing through arithmetic functions.[33] The connectivity between the nodes gives the power to the network. The color of the connectors represents the “weight” or the influence of the given node in the network [Figure 2].

Figure 2:: Simple neural network showing the input layer, the hidden layer, and the output layer. The lines between the input layer and the hidden layer are of different colors illustrating different weights applied.

The network then establishes the output or the most probable diagnosis. This output is dependent on the amount of data (input) and the weights allocated to the data at the input level. For neural networks to learn and be efficient, very large amount of data must be correctly labeled and weighted [Figure 3].

Figure 3:: Deep neural network. The variables on the left are input into nodes. Random weights are allocated to the layers and allow the network to “learn” by back propagation.

Finding and applying the most appropriate treatment approach to a specific malocclusion despite the multiple variables presented requires that the software accumulates and trains on a large quantity of data.

SUPERVISED VERSUS UNSUPERVISED LEARNING

The use of AI in Orthodontics is, for the moment, limited to supervised learning such as objects or point recognition. The best example is cephalometric software programs such as WEBceph™ or AudaxCeph™, Cephio™, CephX™, DentaliQOrtho™, EYES.OF.AI™, and FPT-Software™ which are trained to recognized points in cephalometric radiographs to facilitate cephalometric analyses.[34] For clinical purposes, Cephalometric Landmark Identification Data could readily be extended even to predict and visualize soft-tissue changes after treatment. The application of AI in automated cephalometric landmark identification may lessen the burden and alleviate human errors. By gathering radiographic data automatically, it also helps reduce human tasks and the time required for both research and clinical purposes(Ji-Hoon Park et al.). AI showed as accurate an identification of cephalometric landmarks as did human examiners. AI always detects identical position which implies that AI may be the reliable option for repeatedly identifying multiple cephalometric landmarks [Figure 4] (Hye-Won Hwang et al.).

Figure 4:: Cephalometric automatic point detection.

Another use of AI is found in the automation of case setups for indirect bracketing or production of aligners. These automated setups allow for the visualization of treatment outcomes using specific algorithms again based on supervised learning. More efficient biomechanical applications using 3D physics are already reported.[35,36] New algorithms are being developed to identify teeth in Cone Beam CTs automatically [Figure 5].[37]

Figure 5:: Indirect bracketing using artificial intelligence.

Unsupervised learning is referred to a higher level of complexity where the data provided is not labeled or classified. The computer program in an unsupervised mode will “train” algorithms to recognize patterns and suggest potential outcomes from a dataset.[38] In orthodontics, unsupervised learning is starting be used to input a large quantity of malocclusions and let the computer predict the most appropriate treatment options. The before and after treatment casts of a large number of orthodontic cases are fed into a neural network. The neural network will then recognize patterns and train itself to recognize and suggest the best course of action.[39] Another application is to assist the orthodontist in choosing a modality of treatment such as an extraction or a non-extraction pattern.[40] All reports are predictive in essence totally, but the authors warn that the validity of their findings is dependent on the training received by the neural network. This network would lose predictive accuracy rapidly if the case studied is not readily identified in the training dataset [Figure 6a and b].[39]

Figure 6:: (a) Conventional approach to diagnose and treatment plan an orthodontic case. (b) Artificial intelligence supported approach to diagnose and treatment plan orthodontic cases.

What can our profession do to prepare and be part of the upcoming AI revolution?

“Data is power” in the digital age and it becomes evident that solutions must be put forward to ensure that orthodontic data are protected by the profession in the same manner as medical data are not disseminated without previous understanding of its potential use.[41] When shared and protected adequately, the amount of data gathered each day in orthodontic offices combined to deep neural networks have the potential to become a great source of advancement for the profession. These neural networks will first need to be proven to be functional and reliable.

Big data feed deep learning machines. To be efficient and of use to the orthodontic field, significant amount of data needs to be gathered and processed. Malocclusions, with their multitude of variables presented to the orthodontist, require very complex networks before machine learning using unsupervised learning will have a significant impact on the treatment of malocclusions.

Even if some of the reports on the accomplishments of the latest algorithms seem revolutionary, the applications for this technology are narrow and difficult to implement. It will be up to the orthodontic profession to adapt to this new and highly disturbing environment. Currently, the bulk of the research is performed by companies leaving the orthodontic profession in a potential vulnerable position.

Declaration of patient consent

Patient’s consent not required as patient’s identity is not disclosed or compromised.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. . Invisalign: Early experiences. J Orthod. 2003;30:348-52.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. . Advances in digital technology and orthodontics: A reference to the Invisalign method. Med Sci Monit. 2005;11:PI39-42.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. , , , , . Accuracy of clear aligners: A retrospective study of patients who needed refinement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;154:47-54.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. . Information Technology Platform for the 1990's.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. , , , , , . Orthodontic Systems and Methods Including Parametric Attachments. Google Patents;.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. , . Principles of orthodontic diagnosis. Angle Orthod. 1966;36:258-62.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. . Orthodontics: Art, science, or trans-science? Angle Orthod. 1974;44:243-50.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. , . Assessing malocclusion-the time factor. Br J Orthod. 1998;25:31-4.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. . The evolution of orthodontics to a data-based specialty. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:545-7.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. , , , . Recognition of malocclusion: An education outcomes assessment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:444-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. , , , . Illustration of bayesian inference in normal data models using gibbs sampling. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85:972-85.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. . . Available from: https://www.e2eml.school/blog.html
    [Google Scholar]
  13. . The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78:775-80.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. . Bayesian-based decision support system for assessing the needs for orthodontic treatment. Healthc Inform Res. 2018;24:22-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. , . Heuristic reasoning and cognitive biases: Are they hindrances to judgments and decision making in orthodontics? Am J Orthod dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:297-304.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. , . Diagnostic error and clinical reasoning. Med Educ. 2010;44:94-100.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. , . Prediction, diagnosis, and causal thinking in forecasting In: Behavioral Decision Making. Berlin: Springer; . p. 311-28.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. , , . Differential diagnostic analysis system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;106:641-8.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. , . Multilayer flow modulator stent technology: A treatment revolution for US patients? Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:217-21.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. . Ordinary orthodontics: Starting with the end in mind. World J Orthod. 2000;1:45-54.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. , , , , , editors. MLC++: A machine learning library in C++ In: Proceedings Sixth International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence TAI 94. United States: IEEE; .
    [Google Scholar]
  22. , . A History of Algorithms: From the Pebble to the Microchip Berlin: Springer; .
    [Google Scholar]
  23. , . Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; . p. 242.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. , . Perspectives to definition of big data: A mapping study and discussion. J Innov Manag. 2016;4:69-91.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. , , . Deep learning. Nature. 2015;521:436-44.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. , , , , . Dentronics: Towards robotics and artificial intelligence in dentistry. Dent Mater. 2020;36:765-78.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. , , . Image nzet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Commun ACM. 2017;60:84-90.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. . Probabilistic machine learning and artificial intelligence. Nature. 2015;521:452-9.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. , . Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques Cambridge: MIT Press; .
    [Google Scholar]
  30. . An Introduction to Probabilistic Graphical Models. preparation;.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. , , , , , , et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten zip code recognition. Neural Comput. 1989;1:541-51.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. . The perceptron: A probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain In: Neurocomputing: Foundations of Research. Cambridge: MIT Press; . p. 89-114.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. . Pattern Recognition in Medical Imaging United States: Academic Press, Inc.; .
    [Google Scholar]
  34. , , , , editors. Learning orthodontic cephalometry through augmented reality: A conceptual machine learning validation approach In: In: 2018 International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICELTICs). United States: IEEE; .
    [Google Scholar]
  35. , , , , editors. Design of the invisalign system performance In: Seminars in Orthodontics. Amsterdam: Elsevier; .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. , , , , . Application of digital diagnostic impression, virtual planning, and computer-guided implant surgery for a CAD/CAM-fabricated, implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:402-8.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. , , , editors. Tooth net: Automatic tooth instance segmentation and identification from cone beam CT images In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. , , , editors. Design and implementation of software simulation system for dental orthodontic robot In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Bristol: IOP Publishing; .
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. , , , , , , et al. TANet: Towards Fully Automatic Tooth Arrangement. Cham: Springer;
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. , , , , , , et al. Orthodontic treatment planning based on artificial neural networks. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2037.
    [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. , , , . Big data in medical research and EU data protection law: Challenges to the consent or anonymise approach. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:956-60.
    [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Show Sections