The Double-sided Intrusion Spring
This article was originally published by Wolters Kluwer and was migrated to Scientific Scholar after the change of Publisher of the Journal; therefore Scientific Scholar has no control over the quality or content of this article.
Deep bite is a malocclusion component that can cause unpleasant gingival display and traumatic ulcers. Furthermore, it can hinder the space closure in upper extraction cases because when intended to the space closure, upper incisors strike against the lower ones.
Various methods have been previously introduced for opening the bite, such as the archwires with the accentuated and reversed curve of Spee (AARCS), utility arch, three-piece intrusion arch, Connecticut intrusion arch, mini screw-supported techniques, and others.[1-3]
Of these methods, the most practical is certainly the AARCS technique. This technique, which does not require any auxiliary apparatus, can solve the problem with only one piece of the archwire.
The most critical problem with the AARCS is the protrusion of the upper and lower incisors. Studies have shown that the center of resistance for the anterior segment, which is composed of lateral and central incisors, is located on a projection line perpendicular to the occlusal plane between the canines and the first premolars.[4,5] Therefore, if the intrusion mechanism is applied at this point, the anterior segment can be moved purely in the apical direction without flaring. With AARCS, since force is applied to the brackets, and they are located more anteriorly according to the center of resistance, flaring of the incisors inevitably occurs.
The three-piece intrusion arch, which was introduced by Burstone, is significantly different from the others in terms of avoiding incisor flaring. The application point of this mechanism is positioned between the lateral and canine teeth to get as close to the center of resistance as possible. Another benefit is that since it is not fully engaged to the bracket slots, force can be adjusted and more gently force can be delivered.
Despite these advantages, the three-piece intrusion arch’s main disadvantage is the reactive force that is exerted on the distal segment, including molar and premolars. While incisors intrude with the aid of the arch, the reactive force causes extrusion of the distal segment. This handicap occurs not only with the three-piece intrusion arch but also with most of the intrusion arches, such as the utility and Connecticut intrusion arches. In patients who were decided to require pure incisor intrusion after the functional evaluation of gingival line about the upper lip line, molar extrusion is a side effect of orthodontic treatment.
The present article introduces a new technique that can be used for incisor intrusion without the aforementioned handicaps such as incisor flaring and molar extrusion. As opposed to extrusion, we even assert that molar intrusion can be achieved due to the nature of the mechanism.
This intrusion system is composed of three components as follows: a main archwire, a vertical tube, and the double-sided intrusion spring (DIS). Before the intrusion stage, teeth must be well-leveled and aligned. DIS is preferably constructed of 0.017 × 0.025 - inch titanium molybdenum alloy, which can provide a desirable constant force. The main archwire, which engages to the sagittal part of the vertical tube as much as possible, provides stabilization of the spring. Preferably, 0.017 × 0.025-inch stainless steel for 0.018-inch bracket, and 0.019 × 0.025-inch stainless steel for 0.022-inch bracket are inserted as the main archwire [Figure 1].
DIS can be used for both mandibular and maxillary incisor intrusion without any constructional modification. The sole difference between them is the amount of force that is exerted by the spring, and this can be easily adjusted with the aid of the helix. In addition, DIS has the advantage of not requiring the use of a band as compared to the other options. It utilizes from the vertical tube inserted to the archwire.
The application point can be changed according to the desired intrusion type, such as intrusion protrusion or bodily intrusion. The spring is applied between the central and lateral incisors, or the lateral incisor and canine. As another alternative, it can be tied to the canine bracket with a piece of stainless steel ligature wire.
The key feature in this system is the use of a vertical tube positioned between the first molar and second premolar teeth. This method ensures that reactive force does not extrude the molar teeth. Moreover, the spring actually makes the posterior segment intrude with the aid of the vertical tube [Figure 2].
Conventional intrusion arches such as the utility, three-piece, and Connecticut intrusion arches have the same basic technique; using tip-back bends at the molars to supply intrusive forces to the incisors. This technique results in desirable incisor intrusion, but the same time, undesirable molar extrusion inevitably occurs. The main difference between DIS and the others is that the direction of the anchorage unit is rotated from the sagittal to the vertical plane. This rotation causes significant changes, including molar intrusion rather than extrusion [Figures 3-5].
In addition, since the force application point can be carried to the posterior part of the dental arch, unlike the other alternatives such as AARCS and utility arch, incisor intrusion can be successfully accomplished through DIS without flaring [Figure 6].
DIS is a new spring design that can be used for incisor intrusion. The major advantage of this system over other options is that it also achieves molar intrusion while incisor intrusion is happening.